Sep 14, IN A post last week, I missed the main point of a New York Times op-ed by Peter shrubdelimbing.buzz Orszag's basic point was that in the long run we can't afford to extend the Bush tax cuts Missing: Anaheim CA. The Economists' statement opposing the Bush tax cuts was a statement signed by roughly economists, including ten of the twenty-four American Nobel Prize laureates alive at the time, in February who urged the U.S. President George W. Bush not to enact the tax cuts; seeking and sought to gather public support for the position.
The statement was printed as a full-page ad in The New York Estimated Reading Time: 3 mins. Economists’ statement opposing the Bush tax cutsMultimedia April 3, Read the Economists’ statement.
View list of signatories. Read the press release. View New York Times advertisement: ″ x 11″ ad.
13″ x 21″ ad. Listen to February 10, news shrubdelimbing.buzzg: Anaheim CA. Dec 19, Mr Bush, by contrast, held out the prospect of huge tax cuts which now look even more appealing as a way to bolster consumer spending and avert a recession.
In fact, the issue of tax cuts Missing: Anaheim CA. The phrase Bush tax cuts refers to changes to the United States tax code passed originally during the presidency of George W. Bush and extended during the presidency of Barack Obama, through: Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of American Taxpayer Relief Act of While each act has its own legislative history and effect on the tax Estimated Reading Time: 12 mins.